思即美德

Thinking as a Virtue

究竟应该是 engineers as designers,还是 designers lead engineers?

Google 很明显是前者,Apple 很明显是后者。

当手机和笔记本电脑的技术进步步伐放缓,从高科技产品转变为消费类电子产品的时候,有些公司迅速随环境一起变革,获得市场成功;有些公司并没有及时意识到市场的变化,被置于不利地位;当然,也有些公司是永远不会进入消费类电子领域的,选择壮士断腕。

问题是,在今天的互联网领域,市场是仍处在技术进步引导创新的时期,还是技术已经高度同质化,开始进入设计主导的时期?

今天的许多 Web 2.0 网站,胜在设计而非技术,似乎在预示着后者的来临,但从另一个角度考虑,web applications 大势所趋,将桌面应用悉数转移到互联网上,又意味着一个巨大的技术进步的空间,这些技术进步也必将推动市场进步……

Designer: Hi, I don't think we've met yet. I'm the designer. I just started, and I have a bit of a technical question.

Engineer: That's what I'm here for. What's the problem?

Designer: Well, I was wondering how you set the font in HTML? How do I make sure that our audience gets their text in Myriad MM light norm 12 pt?

Engineer: Oh that's an easy one!

Designer: Great! What is it?

Engineer: You can't. Cheers!

Designer: That doesn't make any sense.

Engineer: Sure it does. You see, HTML is designed to work on all computers and all displays. You don't know what fonts people are going to have installed on their machines or even if they have monitors. They may be visually impaired, you know. So trying to set the font is a useless endeavor.

Designer: So I'm stuck designing with the default fonts set by the Web browser?

Engineer: Well, unless readers set their own fonts.

Designer: What?

Engineer: Yeah, check it out. I've set up my font sand display just the way I like it: black background,orange text, and the fonts are all Courier.

Designer: AAAHHHHHH!!!!! You fiend! My designs! My beautiful designs! All ruined! What a world ... what a world....

Engineer: Well that's what you get when you try to control visual presentation on a multi platform environment.

Engineer: Stupid designer.

Some time later ...

Designer: I figured it out!

Engineer: What? What did you figure out?

Designer: Fonts on the Web. I got them to work.

Engineer: WOW! It's ... it's beautiful! Elegant,refined, readable. I don't understand. This shouldn't be possible. How'd you do this?

Designer: Oh, it was easy. I made our entire site into a background GIF, flattened the text down into the bitmap, and then just made an image map around all the linkable items.

Engineer: But that's monstrous! It's unstructured! It's unsearchable! It's unindexable! It's ... it's ...

Designer: It's got the font control that I need.

Engineer: (looks at file size) IT'S 150KILOBYTES!!!!

Designer: But I have the fonts I needed.

Engineer: AHHHH!!!!!! My server! My poor server!What a world! What a world.

Designer: Stupid engineer.
人类已经有丰富的经验在判断一个人是否胜任时摒情感因素的影响,客观地呈现一个人的实际水平,却为何不将之运用在选择一个国家/地区的行政长官上呢?

每张选票一个名字的选举制度,是一种曾经先进,现在已经完全落后于时代的方法。人群的疯狂和非理性,是现有选举制度与生俱来的软肋,它正在成为最主要的弊端,也是回避实施选举制度的重要理由。面对不断进化的竞选手段,我们究竟需要的是每人做出一个无论是头脑发热还是充分考虑的判断,并且在接下来的几年内接受自己的选择,还是引导每人做出一个理性的判断,然后接受自己的选择?

我的意思是,我们有没有可能借鉴民间早已成熟的管理的经验,引入一系列指标来供选民判断,综合计算选民对候选人在每一指标上的评分得出结论,而不是要求选民只选择一个名字了事。通过对这一系列指标的不断(民主地)完善,我们可以保证选出来的领导人越来越“靠谱”。当然,这并不意味着情感因素不被考虑,而是让情感因素不会占到一个不恰当的比例,甚至干脆左右我们的结论。这一系列指标会帮助绝大多数人做出理性的判断,当然也会有极端的选民为一定要某个候选人而填写出一张极端的选票,我想说的是,我们至少能通过统计分析判断出这些极端的选票,至于应不应当将它们作废,或许在完善制度的过程中由民意来决定吧。

这种选举方式在技术上变得可行,原因是相对于选举制度出现的时代,我们在各方面有了大幅的进步,首先我们的记票技术足够满足计算更大的数据量,这在当初无法想像;更重要的是民主国家的教育水平,特别是投票人群的教育水平,也提升到一个新的高度,选民已经可以理解选票中的更多信息,而不是简单的人名。

我们是时候少看到一些民主闹剧给当地带来的混乱,甚至给它国带来的痛苦了。
所有经我推荐和没经我推荐购买了 ThinkPad 的朋友,有空可以看看这个 blog,是一个在 Lenovo Think 部门的工程师写的,解答了不少问题,也有不少有用的信息,最新的大变化什么的,关键是还可以向他提问。

http://thinklenovo.spaces.live.com